5 Reasons to use off-camera Flash at Receptions

090909-lowlightflash-12

Nikon D700 + 105mm f2 @ISO1250, f2.2 & 1/100. Off-camera flash: Nikon SB900 triggered via Quantum FW10w Transceivers

Yesterday I was talking with a marketing director of a flash company about flash needs in the 21st Century.  We all know we love balancing and, at times, overpowering sun with flash.  But how about lighting with off-camera flash in low-light/high-ISO surroundings?

There’s lots of relatively high-powered flashes made for bright shooting and overpowering dark scenes.  What’s lacking is a professional strobe with *really* low-powered output for accenting low-light environments.

“We’re not in Kansas anymore …”

Today’s camera technology is simply amazing.  We can shoot at 6400ISO with image-stabilized lenses, allowing us to get shots which were impossible even a few short years ago.

Ironically, this post has come up because I believe, now more than ever, the ability to shape and mold your flash in *all* circumstances will help set you apart from the competition.

There’s a lot of ground to cover when dealing with flash, so let’s narrow the scope for the sake of this discussion.  I’m not talking about adding a widget and bouncing your on-camera flash against a wall or ceiling.  I’m talking about going a level beyond and wirelessly triggering well-placed off-camera flashes. Accent instead of over-powering ambient light.

For this post, I’m talking about dark venues. Really dark venues.  Take, for example, last weekend’s reception venue with an ambient light reading of 3200ISO, 1/80 and f2.  When I say “low-powered flash” I mean having to add a 3-stop neutral density gel to a Nikon SB900 or Canon 580EXII manually set to 1/128 power to balance the fore-mentioned low light levels and still having to shoot at 1600ISO and f2.

Ugly light notice: In an effort to show a fair comparison of images with and without flash, the images for this post were sucked out of RAW via PhotoMechanic’s “Extract JPEG” feature.  For the uninitiated, this means there was no WB, toning, contrast, exposure or other adjustments made at all to these images.  This is as SOOC (Straight Out Of Camera) as it gets!  Photoshop was only used to run our logo/resizing droplet.  All images have their EXIF info intact and were taken from this past weekend’s wedding so there’s no cherry picking from a billion weddings either.  The funky ambient light is brought to you by a mixture of tungsten and sodium vapor overhead lights.

If you’re still here, you must be either (a) a photographer interested in bettering your lighting craft, (b) crazy or (c) both.

Welcome to my world and thanks for joining me in the Crazy Photographer category! :) Now let’s get down to bizness …

Lighting with style: 5 Reasons to use off-camera Flash at Receptions:

ambient:

090909-lowlightflash-03

with flash:

090909-lowlightflash-04

5. Variety in imagery. Adding flash to your arsenal allows you to create more variety in your coverage.  I want to note that more variety doesn’t mean adding light for the sake of it in the same way it wouldn’t mean giving your clients duplicate images to look at for the sake of upping the numbers.  No two situations will be alike, so really assessing your surroundings and adding the right amount, color and quality of light to balance the room is key to making great lit imagery.  Moment, composition and expression are as important as ever if your image is going to have impact.

4. Add Drama & Focus.  Most receptions we shoot are dim and quite flatly lit or, worse, lit with mixed light sources.  Yes: I’ve seen and shot some amazingly lit venues, but those are few and far between, and even in these scenes I’ll often choose to add flash to mold and move your eye to where I want it.    Think of well-placed off-camera flashes as in-camera dodge and burn: use your flash to dodge and guide your viewer.  Another great side effect: slightly underexposing ambient and accenting with flash can help minimize distracting backgrounds, people and clutter.

ambient:

090909-lowlightflash-09

with flash:

090909-lowlightflash-10

3. Uncle Bob can’t see (or use) your light. We’ve shot weddings where a guest pulled out the latest DSLR with an 85 f1.2 and another with a 300 f2.8.  Serious lens-envy material!  No matter how good the camera and glass, Uncle Bob can’t vision what you’re doing with your flashes.  Being able to surprise your clients with imagery they literally couldn’t see with their own eyes is one of the most gratifying parts of the job. For us, judicious use of off-camera flash has become an essential tool to this end.

2. No post-processing needed (or “Look Ma: No hands!”). There’s nothing quite like the feeling when you nail a great image straight out of camera.  It’s like that feeling when you hit your best golf stroke or perform that perfect solo on the keys (not that I’d know what either of these feels like … heh heh).  While I’m a believer in finishing images in post with Lightroom and Photoshop, all images in this post had absolutely *no* post-processing applied to show that adding the right flash-light to your shooting workflow can take hours off your post-shoot time in front of your computer.

ambient:

090909-lowlightflash-07

with flash:

090909-lowlightflash-08

1. Because other’s don’t. There’s lots of reasons *not* to use flash: ” My camera shoots at ISO 2000000!”  “My pics are good enough without it.”  Or, to be honest, many may say, “It’s too much work” or “I don’t know how.”  All these reasons make it easier for those who DO choose to push beyond their comfort zone and use off-camera flash to stand out from the pack. Thankfully with the great choices of tools  and teachers we have in our industry there’s little stopping us from experimenting and getting comfy with off-camera flash.

ambient:

090909-lowlightflash-01

with flash:

090909-lowlightflash-02

Our ultimate goal has always been to give our clients unique and better imagery than anyone else will or can.  Of course we take the ambient-light shots, but why stop there?  Take the time to learn your flash rig and you may be surprised to see what develops.

—-

So now what?  Through lots of hard work, testing, and trial and error, we’ve managed to tame our existing flashes to do our bidding.  But I’m hoping that a flash company comes along and fills this niche of a super-low-light pro-flash, making it unnecessary for us to tape umpteen ND and warming gels in the quest to get just-the-right pop of flash.  So what’s my ideal low-light flash?  I’m glad you asked :)   Here’s my wishlist:

+ Runs off 2 or 4 AA batteries (lithium batteries ok if it doesn’t sacrifice recycle time and can keep the size down)

+ Small & light form factor with tilt/swivel zoom head

+ Manual power down to 6400ISO & f2 at 15″

+ Super-fast recycle time

+ Hotshoe/auto mode and 1/8″ miniphone sync-in

+ Bonus: wireless iTTL (Nikon) and/or eTTL (Canon) receiver

Pretty much a mini-SB900 or 580EXII would fit the bill. And, for any flash companies reading, just to sweeten the pot: I’ll even volunteer to test prototypes for FREE! :D

090909-lowlightflash-13

Crafting light is a passion of mine, so I’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic.  Agree or disagree?  What’s keeping you from lighting at weddings?  Or, if you’re already lighting your receptions, I’d love to see what you’re doing too.

Cheers and happy flashing :)

Comments

seb
Posted on 9th September, 2009

Very interesting and inspiring article. Lucky that there were all those flowers to hide the flash ;)

John Edgar.
Posted on 9th September, 2009

I use off camera flash for 90% of the wedding day and the biggest problem I have is as you described. While I can over power / balance a scene very well using my 580. I can’t however, just add a splash of light to a face or a background, just enough to change the dynamic of the light in the scene but still keep it very natural. Traditionally I’d use video light for this, however more and more I find brides really not enjoying being blasted with a video light all day. I find myself able to get a pretty good balance of flash added around 1600ISO 2000th or so wide open, but it’s still not perfect and I still find the background really darkens down more than I’d like.. I’d love something that fired at 10″ or so around f2 in the 3200 range.

While we’re on the topic of complaining about flash… If anyone from Canon is listening, my 580EXIIs miss fire often, and more importantly, please DITCH the current infra red / pre flash ETTL system for something radio ala radiopopper. The current flash system is a joke and coupled with awful awful AF, makes me want to switch systems.

Aaron Downs
Posted on 9th September, 2009

I’m impressed with your SOOC shots. Using the flash that way really does drive the shot in a different direction. I’m yet to drive my ISO up to 3200 or 6400 as my current gear doesn’t cut the goods at that range. But the possibilities are endless with creativity.

I find the current OEM flashes are a pain as I don;t think I should have to buy lots of expensive additions to get eTTL off camera. I agree with John that Canon should get a better transmission system and beat Nikon too it. I was working with another photog using Nikon and my flashes were setting her’s off.

brett maxwell
Posted on 14th September, 2009

I have also been in the position many times where 1/128 isn’t low enough. I just slap a 3-stop ND on and I can always go to 1/64 or 1/32 if that’s too much ND. Of course I’d like to see the flash you described made, but that’s such an incredibly niche market that I find it highly unlikely.

DWF » Blog Archive » Accenting Ambient Light at Dark Receptions
Posted on 15th September, 2009

[...] DWF superstar Dave Cheung has dropped an informative and insightful post on the QuiKeys blog about using off-camera flash at receptions. Dave has a slightly different take on off-camera lighting at receptions than most people. Most [...]

Dave
Posted on 15th September, 2009

Seb: yup! Love it when there’s flowers :D You can see our “naked” second flash in several of the shots tho … I don’t mind having it in the frame so long as it’s not distracting the viewer’s eye.

John: Totally feel your pain man. Years ago we were video light users, but found the heavy batteries, heat, and distraction it caused reason to find other ways to light. Any light you can create with a vid light you can create with a flash, and I’m looking forward to the day we get super-low-powered flashes; it’ll be wonderful to craft our light in a new way :)

Aaron: Thanks! Re: eTTL/iTTL. We shoot manually and trigger wireless flashes manually as well. I find TTL systems lacking in consistency. I’m surprised there was cross-talk btw Canon & Nikon! But I’ve seen stranger things happen too

Brett: 3-stop ND makes my colors go wonky. I compensate with several fractional CTO and Straw gels, but it really could be easier. You’re right tho: it’s super-niche. But if the right tools and education are available I’m hoping we, as an industry, can elevate our craft even in super-low-light.

Matt: Thanks for the linko!!

I know it’s a small crowd I’m trying to reach but this stuff truly lights me on fire :) Thanks for the comments everyone! Makes it worthwhile to take time to craft posts like this in the future :)

Blessings …

Tweets that mention 5 Reasons to use off-camera Flash at Receptions | QuiKeys :: the Photo-Geek Blog -- Topsy.com
Posted on 16th September, 2009

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by kevinwick and crash8130. crash8130 said: RT @jasongroupp: Good read by @dqstudios: 5 reasons to use off camera flash @ receptions. http://tinyurl.com/oy3p3n [...]

Mark
Posted on 16th September, 2009

Does anyone have trouble grabbing focus in low light situations? Is there any helpful hints about that?

Dave
Posted on 19th September, 2009

Hey Mark: It’ll definitely be dependent on your particular camera/lens choice. We shoot with Nikon D700’s and primes and find the focus to be more than acceptable in the above lighting situations. Only way to know is to try and test. If it doesn’t work, make sure you’re in single-shot mode and perhaps turn on your flash/flash commander’s focus assist, although you may find the red pattern it projects intrusive.

Lambert
Posted on 29th September, 2009

How about building a small dome for your flash so as to difuse your light more evenly…also use a smaller low powered flash for these purposes using a radio triger.

Michael
Posted on 27th October, 2009

Hi Dave,

Great article.
Do you find that the light coming from the bottom is not the most flattering source? Sometimes it works and sometimes might not. What about zooming your flash and adding a snoot. Raising higher up and shooting from the distance will give the subject nice fill and look. I think this will be less intrusive as well.

Dave
Posted on 1st November, 2009

Yo Michael,

Agreed about light placement/quality/direction, but adding a light stand or light-man and snoot would be intrusive to low-light reception shooting I’m specifically speaking about in this post. The last image you’ll notice the flash on a light-stick from above, but using your flash in a variety of ways can certainly help create different looks and feels.

Cris
Posted on 11th November, 2009

Great article, something I have been experimenting with myself. I have to admit that I haven’t added ND gels and will be trying this next time :) What I have tried is using a video light rather than flash, the last picture on my blog under “Lorna & Dave – Wedding Pictures” shows the type of results we are getting. Thanks for getting my brain going again on this.

G.E. Masana
Posted on 17th November, 2009

A good report about the lost art of accent lighting at venues. Very cool stuff. Though I wonder if brides and grooms may b!tch a bit afterwards about that placement of a strobe on their dais that kept blinding them throughout the night (as in your last photo).

Other than that, and not to take away from it in the least, what I found very notable and so rare, which makes it therefore deserving of praise, was your correct spelling of “heh heh”.

Neil
Posted on 19th November, 2009

Only if they’re cheap enough that I can buy 5-10!

photografika
Posted on 2nd December, 2009

Super article, thank you for sharing Michael!

Ian W
Posted on 22nd December, 2009

There’s a couple of nice with-flash shots here, but for many of the pairs I like, or even prefer, the straight ambient shot. I certainly wouldn’t suggest abandoning ambient shooting, and indeed a *wink* of fill might help some of those.

Philip Smith
Posted on 8th January, 2010

Great article. I’ve only just started lighting with of camera, but look forward to trying out some on the ideas I’ve got from here. Thanks.

Raul Kling
Posted on 9th January, 2010

Excellent article. I totally agree with everything you shared. Off camera flash is the way to go. Photography, after all, means “painting with light”. Painting doesn’t mean splashing-the-subject-with-direct-light, but adding a stroke here, and a stroke there, creating thus the image you foresaw in your mind. How cool is it when you can do the same at a wedding reception.

johnlo
Posted on 2nd March, 2010

this post has been so inspirating to read. Just wanted to say Thank You for writing it. I think I have read it like 10 times.. most of them are right before a shoot.

Kate Miller
Posted on 6th March, 2010

Dave, this is good stuff. I’ve been using my flashes off camera in ittl and I find that they are waaay to overpowering at times. I bring an assistant to hold the flash on a stick and follow me around the floor.

HonlPhoto has lots of light modifiers for speedlights and I’m thinking about trying some out to keep the light from spreading everywhere. Maybe in combination with a couple stops of ND?

Do you have trouble focusing in the low-light? My AF assit illuminator never seems to help and I have missed a couple of great shots because of this problem. I’ve heard of other photographers using video lights to correct this, but then there goes the beauty of lighting off camera…

Leave your Comment